Welcome to your local community website...
Library campaigners 'will fight on'
CAMPAIGNERS in Brent have vowed to fight the decision to close half of the borough's libraries, which was rubber-stamped by the Labour-run council this week.
The authority's executive approved its 'Libraries Transformation Project' at a meeting on Monday (11) despite a storm of protest and repeated calls for the culpable councillors to resign.
Several counter proposals to the closures of Barham Park, Cricklewood, Kensal Rise, Neasden, Preston Road and Tokyngton libraries were put forward, but all were dismissed by the lead member for environment, planning and culture, Councillor James Powney (Kensal Green).
Opposition members responded by calling-in the decision, made after 82 per cent of Brent residents responding to the council's consultation opposed it.
Dr Shahra Ali, from Brent Green Party, was in the audience. "What this moment betrays is the inability of the exec to even stand up and be counted, if nothing else."
Declaring to challenge the decision, former council leader, Councillor Paul Lorber (Sudbury, Lib Dem) said: "Local people have worked tirelessly to put suitable alternatives together and in return they are ignored."
Resident Priya Shah, who helped lead the campaign to save Preston Library with a petition of nearly 6,000 signatures, said: "The idea that depriving whole areas of a library will mean a better service is absurd.
"Labour has betrayed us and has no respect for the people they are supposed to be representing. We expected them to stand up to government cuts on our behalf. We were wrong - power has clearly corrupted."
Many of the library campaigns are set to meet this week to discuss potential legal action, as one declared that the council had "thrown democracy into serious jeopardy".
Council leader Ann John had given up the first hour of Monday's meeting to hear various speakers, ranging in age from seven to 90-years-old.
Seven-year-old Jasmine Mainoo said: "My mum can't afford to keep buying my books, I am speaking for all the children, please don't close Preston Library."
Morris Cohen, aged 90, spoke in favour of Neasden Library. He said: "Neasden used to be a no-go area but the library has been a positive influence, it will deteriorate if you close it."
Campaigning to save Barham Park Library in Sudbury was Violet Steele, chair of Brent Pensioners' Forum.
Breaking down in tears, she said: "Local people feel disappointed by the council, which recently invested in modernising the library and included a children centre in it, only to propose to close it just three months after reopening."
But the Labour cabinet could not be persuaded. Councillor George Crane (Fryent) repeated their claim that the cut to Brent's budget imposed by the government, worth £100million over four years, had forced the closures.
Audience members again cried out, asking why £100million was instead being spent on a new town hall, and why a table tennis facility was being installed at Willesden Green.
Mr Powney outlined the council's arguments. He said: "Opening our libraries seven days a week will make them more accessible, not less, and enhance the service for many people.
"It is not just a matter of geographical issues. Our response to concerns of equality in the consultation has been an expansion of the outreach service to schools and improvements for housebound people."
Regularly interrupted by heckling from the audience, he continued: "There are more things to consider than just what people said in the consultation.
"We are designing a library service supposed to promote libraries to the whole population, and we also have to take into account people who don't currently use the library service."
But residents have refused to admit defeat. Save Kensal Rise Library will meet tonight (Thursday 14) at 7pm in the Scout Hall in Leighton Gardens to discuss a new way forward.
We'd like to hear from you. Send your stories, pics and videos
Older/Newer
« Tube lift may never be used | Do you have what it takes to become a foster carer in Brent? »

Reports that 82 per cent of local people are against Brent Council's plans for libraries are incorrect.
During consultation on these proposals, 1,134 people responded saying they were opposed. Of these, 98 per cent were library users - many using the threatened libraries.
If we add in all the signatories of all the petitions and ignore double counting, it means a little over 11,000 were opposed, which is about four per cent of people in Brent.
As well as consultation, the council also undertook research with library users more widely and studied national benchmarks for good practice.
All that information is being used to create a more focused and responsive library service using the six remaining libraries supported by home visits, online functions and outreach services.
The council has to save £41.7million this year and closing six of the less popular or less cost effective libraries will make a significant contribution to those savings while ensuing we provide a value for money, quality library service.
As part of our plans to transform our library service, we will reinvest some of the money saved in radically improving our six remaining libraries so customers can easily borrow from a much wider choice of stock based in modern, high quality buildings.
Had everyone in Brent responded to the libraries consultation, the proportion of those opposed could have been higher than 82 per cent. Or, perhaps, lower.
We will be happy to clarify this in next week's edition.
Preston Library is one of the most efficient libraries in the borough. The only calculation the council uses is faulty. Libraries that are open 7 days a week and offer a whole host of other, non-library services (toilets, computer training, archives), are compared to small libraries that are open for half the time, are a fraction of the size and only offer library services. Comparing like-for-like, which is what a responsible and sensible council would do, would show how well used these libraries are, and therefore how efficient. Only a council determined to close certain libraries will pick whatever data supports their case, and IGNORE the rest. Since the some of the most cost-effective libraries will be closing, the council will NOT be making the savings they claim to want to.